Recent work has shown that certain queue-length based scheduling algorithms, such as max-weight, can lead to poor delays in the presence of bursty traffic. To overcome this phenomenon, we consider the problem of designing scheduling policies that are robust to bursty traffic, while also amenable to practical implementation. Specifically, we discuss two mechanisms, one based on adaptive CSMA, and the second based on maximum-weight scheduling with capped queue lengths. We consider a simple queueing network consisting of two conflicting links. The traffic served by the first link is bursty, and is modeled as being heavy-tailed, while traffic at the second link is modeled using a light-tailed arrival process. In this setting, previous work has shown that even the light-tailed traffic would experience heavy-tailed delays under max-weight scheduling. In contrast, we demonstrate a threshold phenomenon in the relationship between the arrival rates and the queue backlog distributions. In particular, we show that with an adaptive CSMA scheme, when the arrival rate of the light-tailed traffic is less than a threshold value, the light-tailed traffic experiences a light-tailed queue backlog at steady state, whereas for arrival rates above the same threshold, the light-tailed traffic experiences a heavy-tailed queue backlog. We also show that a similar threshold behavior for max-weight scheduling with capped queue lengths. © 2013 IFIP.