Header menu link for other important links
X
Wind induced interference factor of multirow cooling towers – A glimpse
Published in Elsevier Ltd
2019
Volume: 200
   
Abstract
Cooling towers constructed in multi rows with close proximity to each other is becoming common in the recent past, a development that is having profound impact on interference. Most of the studies on multirow towers were focused on the arrangement of cooling towers but the effect of wind direction and spacing of cooling towers were not included and very few studies were addressed either wind directions or specific spacings of grouped towers. Wind direction and spacing of cooling towers have an important influence on interference when compared to the arrangement of cooling towers. Effect of interference on specific arrangements like rectangular pattern, rhombic pattern, L-shaped, oblique L-shaped, etc., are less influenced due to the fact that they are effectively controlled by how the interfering cooling towers are positioned with respect to the principal tower whether it is on windward or leeward or on adjacent sides of the principal tower. Further, the cooling towers embedded in wind flow is usually different from the uniform condition drafted in most wind standards since most structures erected in power plants are embedded in the boundary layer flow. Very few researches have addressed the boundary layer flow conditions. Hence in the present study, systematic wind tunnel testing on several combinations of various spacing/diameter ratios of the representative four tower arrangement of cooling tower models are attempted for various wind directions viz. 0–180° under boundary layer flow condition for the interference function of cooling towers. The interference factor values tend to decrease and vary significantly between the spacing ratios (a/dm) 1.9 and 2.5. It is also observed that the IF value has shown high value for spacing ratio of 1.9 with 30% difference when compared to the values of isolated condition. The IF values corresponding to the 2.2, 2.5, 2.8 and 3.1 spacing ratios are 1.26, 1.197, 1.142 and 1.116 which are higher than the isolated values by about 26%, 20%, 14% and 12% respectively. Further from the analysis, a closed form solution is arrived for the interference of multirow towers. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
About the journal
JournalData powered by TypesetEngineering Structures
PublisherData powered by TypesetElsevier Ltd
ISSN01410296
Open AccessNo
Concepts (22)
  •  related image
    Boundary layer flow
  •  related image
    Boundary layers
  •  related image
    Cooling
  •  related image
    Wind tunnels
  •  related image
    Close proximity
  •  related image
    Closed form solutions
  •  related image
    EFFECT OF WIND DIRECTION
  •  related image
    Interference factor
  •  related image
    INTERFERENCE FUNCTIONS
  •  related image
    SPACING RATIO
  •  related image
    Wind directions
  •  related image
    WIND-TUNNEL TESTING
  •  related image
    COOLING TOWERS
  •  related image
    Boundary layer
  •  related image
    Comparative study
  •  related image
    Dynamic analysis
  •  related image
    Dynamic response
  •  related image
    Power plant
  •  related image
    Structural analysis
  •  related image
    Structural response
  •  related image
    Wind direction
  •  related image
    WIND FIELD